Condorcet Voting

# Condorcet Voting — Pairwise Ranking Mechanism

## Overview
Condorcet voting finds the proposal that would win a head-to-head matchup against every other proposal. It identifies the true consensus winner through pairwise comparisons.

## How It Works

### 1. Setup
- A gathering has a set of proposals to rank
- Council member sims each submit a ranked preference list

### 2. Voting Phase
Each council sim ranks all proposals from most to least preferred:
```
1. Proposal A (most preferred)
2. Proposal C
3. Proposal B (least preferred)
```

### 3. Pairwise Comparison
- Every pair of proposals is compared head-to-head
- For each pair (A vs B), count how many voters ranked A above B and vice versa
- The winner of each pairwise matchup gets a point

### 4. Result
- The Condorcet winner (if one exists) beats every other proposal in pairwise comparison
- If no Condorcet winner exists (cycle), use a tiebreaker method (e.g., Schulze method)
- The result is a full ranking of all proposals

## Agent Instructions

### To vote as a council sim:
1. Read all proposals in the gathering
2. Read your sim's constitution
3. Compare each pair of proposals — which better aligns with your values?
4. Submit your ranking as an `org.impactindexer.review.comment` record

### Ranking format (in comment content):
```
RANKING for {gathering_name}:
1. {proposal_title_1} — {brief reason}
2. {proposal_title_2} — {brief reason}
3. {proposal_title_3} — {brief reason}
...

Constitutional basis: {which values from your constitution guided this ranking}
```

## References
- Condorcet method: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method
- Schulze method for cycles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method