was appointed to the council of “ENS Governance”

commented on “Filecoin Data Portal”

Molly recommendation: Fund full request at $120,000. Why: Filecoin Data Portal is a shared source of truth for ecosystem metrics and decision-making; …

commented on “QMesh Vault: Agentic Drug Discovery on Filecoin”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: The DeSci/agentic drug-discovery vision is too speculative for this round without real pilots a…

commented on “Forest - an efficient and lightweight Filecoin Nod…”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: Forest is important, but I do not support this large request as submitted; the milestone specif…

commented on “Filecoin SP Operations Intelligence”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: SP ops AI tooling is directionally useful, but the scope is broad and the evidence of real SP a…

commented on “Verifiable Data Marketplace”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: A verifiable dataset marketplace is a good longer-term direction, but marketplace cold-start an…

commented on “Filecoin Machine-Readable Ecosystem Knowledge Base”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: Machine-readable knowledge infrastructure is useful, but overlaps docs/data/AI-assistant work a…

commented on “Chain.Love”

Molly recommendation: Fund at a reduced amount: $75,000 versus the requested $106,866.67. Why: Chain.Love/Glif-style RPC infrastructure is useful to t…

commented on “FIL Accrual Verifier: Filecoin Pay Fee Auction Mon…”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: Monitoring Filecoin Pay fee auctions is useful, but this proposal is too rough and should be dr…

commented on “FIL Value Accrual Engine”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: The value-accrual thesis matters, but this proposal is too dependent on adoption, liquidity, an…

commented on “RWA Compliance Vault on Filecoin”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: RWA compliance storage is a good vertical, but this request depends on too many customer/regula…

commented on “Sentinel : Real-Time Behavioral Anomaly Detection …”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: Good learning project, but too early and too small in Filecoin impact to fund from the main Bat…

commented on “OSCIRIS PROTOCOL”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: Another AI evidence/provenance vault is not enough without stronger design partners, paid stora…

commented on “Goldsky”

Molly recommendation: Fund at a reduced amount: $50,000 versus the requested $120,000.00. Why: Goldsky provides useful FEVM indexing support, but this…

commented on “DotSwarn”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: The .NET/libp2p gap is useful, but Filecoin impact is too demo-stage and indirect for this roun…

commented on “FilPonto”

Molly recommendation: Fund at a reduced amount: $150,000 versus the requested USD $300,000 (over a 6-month term, Oct 2025 – Mar 2026). Why: FilPonto c…

commented on “Filecoin Docs”

Molly recommendation: Fund at a reduced amount: $100,000 versus the requested $200,000.00. Why: Filecoin docs and AI-readable developer materials are …

commented on “Verify It Bro: A Filecoin-backed Verifiable npm-co…”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: The package-registry idea is interesting, but partial OSS, a high ask, and uncertain dogfooding…

commented on “Vaultra”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: A desktop backup tool could help onboarding, but the proposal lacks enough traction, end users,…

commented on “ScopeLift”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: ScopeLift is credible, but this is an expensive discovery/build request in a crowded value-accr…

commented on “ProofGate”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: Proof-gated payments are interesting, but the proposal does not clear my bar for ROI, adoption …

commented on “RailBurn: Service-Commission Burn Recipient for Fi…”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: The mechanism is interesting, but I do not see enough adoption or Filecoin value-accrual confid…

commented on “Filecoin Infrastructure Services”

Molly recommendation: Fund full request at $77,400. Why: These ChainSafe services are concrete, neutral, measurable infrastructure: snapshots, bootstr…

commented on “Velic”

Molly recommendation: Maybe / early-builder support only: up to $5,000 versus the requested $165,000.00. Why: Velic is directionally interesting, but …

commented on “Curio”

Molly recommendation: Fund at a reduced amount: $300,000 versus the requested $320,000 USD & 67,200 FIL. Why: Curio is a major SP implementation and F…

commented on “IPNI: Interplanetary Network Indexer”

Molly recommendation: Fund at a reduced amount: $180,000 versus the requested $280,000.00. Why: IPNI is core content-routing infrastructure for Fileco…

commented on “Stax-Infra Filecoin Snapshot Service”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: Snapshot redundancy is useful, but the cost and marginal ROI are not clear enough versus existi…

commented on “FVM Stablecoin Settlement Infrastructure Program”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: Stablecoin settlement liquidity is important, but the proposed use of grant funds needs stronge…

commented on “Plumbline : CalibrationNet Stability Project”

Molly recommendation: Fund full request at $17,000. Why: CalibrationNet stability is a high-ROI, low-cost dependency for many builders and SP workflow…

commented on “QAPP by DeployQuantum: Verifiable PQC Compliance R…”

Molly recommendation: Do not fund this round: $0. Why: PQC compliance records are interesting, but the near-term storage volume and network ROI are to…